#2012 yamaha r1 ecu flash rva code#

#2012 yamaha r1 ecu flash rva code#

But on another thought, maybe they can't read the OEM source code? Maybe the guy's just written a program from scratch, or adapted a generic motorbike program? (and no, that's not a comment about him 'stealing' code from ECUnleashed). Tad158, I had a feeling F-T could probably read the standard ECU, but unfortunately for me, I doubt they would share this method - seeing as it's the core of their business. So not only are EU restrictions different to US restrictions, but Turkey restrictions could be different to French or Australian restrictions, and probably California restrictions are probably different to Texas restrictions? Thank you laxwendrof, ejlover and tad158. However, I'd really like to find out for myself. Therefore it doesn't really make sense to have a 1:1 TPS vs APS relationship, or even a linear TPS vs APS relationship.įlash-Tune and ECUnleashed claim to remove these 'restrictions', and the customers on these forums certainly back up their claims. Also by nature, butterfly valves do not have a linear response. It means targeting efficiency around the troughs and restrictions around the peaks.

It takes a lot of tuning to achieve a linear power curve. By nature, petrol motors do not produce linear power curves. Another reason for having a 'restricted' throttle is driveability - in other words, trying to achieve a linear power curve.

For example, having the ability to get WOT at low rpm is not going to help you in the real world - the motor can only breath a certain amount of air at low rpm. I put 'restrictions' in talking marks because I'm not convinced all of the gear and rpm dependent restrictions are actually restrictions. This is going to sound like just another PCV vs Bazzaz vs Flash-Tune vs ECUnleashed thread, but I assure you, it isn't.īasically, I'm interested in reproducing the standard fuel, ignition and throttle maps for my EU (Australian) 2012 R1, so I can truly see the 'restrictions' of the stock ECU.